Monday, 5 April 2010

No, Mr Pullman - just NO!

I've just finished reading Philip Pullman's new novel, The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ - a book that has already brought hate mail for its author because of its suggestion that maybe Jesus had a twin... anyway, I will have a proper review of it later. For now, though I have just one thing to say abou tit.

No, Philip Pullman, just no.

You do NOT get to rip off Monty Python's Life of Brian and treat it like it's a clever comment on the nature of goodness.



Seriously - Pullman lifts this scene almost word-for-word, it seems. And drops it smack-bang in the middle of a serious discussion about the cynical/bleak-nihilist view of what goodness means. I was, it is fair to say, somewhat grumpy about that.

Reason being: it's a genius piece of comedy, but it's not what I'd term a balanced or academic source! I think I'm offended on three levels: the first is the implied (and in my view, unfair) criticism of Christian faith - this is also the least offensive point. The second is the misuse and apparent plagiarism of Monty Python! Finally, I'm upset at the apparent sudden descent into simple-minded point-scoring in what is otherwise a very interesting and thought-provoking book with some fair things to say. What can I say? I take debate seriously. There is a place for comedy within serious debate, of course, but you do have to think about the joke first!

So, there you have it - I am officially in curmudgeon mode at the moment.

0 things wot people said:

Post a Comment

Comments Moderation Policy

This blog is intended to be a place where I can develop my thoughts freely and get free and honest responses. Essentially, it is my safe space, and for that reason I have elected to maintain this blog as a moderated space. However, I am opposed in general to censorship and believe that usually the best way to kill a bad idea is with a better one, so very few comments will be rejected. Comments designed to cause offence for the sake of it (e.g. abusive or inflammatory remarks with no other content), or else those that I feel cross a boundary of human decency, are most likely to be rejected.