I have no words for this, except to say I am sickened that once again when it comes to sex and sexual thoughts, the British legal system is unable to tell the difference between fantasy and reality.
A woman who shared online chats roleplaying fantasies of group sex was later raped by 5 friends at the home of the person with whom she shared her fantasies; but when the logs of the online chats were presented to the court by the defence, the judge ruled that the jury must find the defendant not guilty; and the prosecutor refused to enter his case.
More extensive posts about this can be found here and here.
It is also being discussed on the BDSM website Informed Consent, where most people seem equally appalled at the decision, but some are distressingly unsympathetic to the victim. There are jerks in every community, including BDSM.
My final word on it is a response to this quote: "It is right to say that there is material in the chatlogs from the complainant, who is prepared to entertain ideas of group sex with strangers, where to use her words 'her morals go out of the window'"
The only people whose morals 'went out the window' were the bastards who did this to her. Fucking in whatever manner, with consenting people (whether one or one-hundred-and-one) is not a matter of morality. Forcing people to have sex with you is utterly immoral.
0 things wot people said:
Post a Comment
Comments Moderation Policy
This blog is intended to be a place where I can develop my thoughts freely and get free and honest responses. Essentially, it is my safe space, and for that reason I have elected to maintain this blog as a moderated space. However, I am opposed in general to censorship and believe that usually the best way to kill a bad idea is with a better one, so very few comments will be rejected. Comments designed to cause offence for the sake of it (e.g. abusive or inflammatory remarks with no other content), or else those that I feel cross a boundary of human decency, are most likely to be rejected.