Monday, 26 October 2009

On the Anglican/Catholic transfer deal...

...Nell Gwynne @ Merda D'Artista has pretty much summed up my views on the matter.

I suppose if religions were like businesses, then you could say that the C of E as a brand has made something of a mistake here, and allowed a competitor to steal customers away from them because of an attempt to rebrand to attract new customers. But the market doesn't really seem to exist at the moment making the rebranding a mistake, losing market share and conceding ground to the opposition.

But religion isn't like business - market share, whileimportant, is less important than the honest attempt to do the right thing. The RC Church has opted to remain relevant to the 19th Century (and, heck, it took all the efforts of Pope John Paul II to get the Vatican that far!), while the C of E in a bumbling, haphazard, half-arsed way is attempting to catch up to the 21st Century. Eventually. They are, of course, a long way off (as are most institutions, come to think of it) but at least they show willing.

For those who are comforted by the "traditions" of the hate-riddled old structures, they will be happiest in like company, so I have no issue with them leaving or with the RC Church for accepting them as kindred spirits. At least we get to see a little more clearly who is who.

0 things wot people said:

Post a Comment

Comments Moderation Policy

This blog is intended to be a place where I can develop my thoughts freely and get free and honest responses. Essentially, it is my safe space, and for that reason I have elected to maintain this blog as a moderated space. However, I am opposed in general to censorship and believe that usually the best way to kill a bad idea is with a better one, so very few comments will be rejected. Comments designed to cause offence for the sake of it (e.g. abusive or inflammatory remarks with no other content), or else those that I feel cross a boundary of human decency, are most likely to be rejected.