Sunday, 20 September 2009

Exposé of little old me!

Yes! I'm important enough to be hated by radfems! And targeted by them! And have a whole blog dedicated to discrediting me!

I feel like such a success!

[ETA: the blog they point to has had, according to SiteMeter, zero hits from Snowdrop Exposed in the last 3 months - in fact, it's had more hits from this post than from their blog!]

According to the oh-so-wittily-titled "Snowdrop Exposed!", I am a danger to women everywhere! Even though I can't afford an air fare, and haven't even got a passport! With My black magical powers... (oh, wait, I'm a Christian, I'm not supposed to use magic...) With My evil technological genius powers... (darn it, why won't my computer work properly?) Erm... with my amazing ability to control people's minds with just typing words on the page (except how come I'm totally unable to convince people of my arguments?)... Okay, you got me - I can't affect anyone who's not in the UK, and honestly, if you're more than 10 miles from where I live, you're probably safe!

And in fact, because I am self-aware enough to have been able to write the post that has these radfems all hot under the collar, I'm probably safer than the majority of humans, despite also being rather violent in personality.

Anyway, to business! I chose to write this to debunk a few of the (being generous!) misinterpretations about a very dark and disturbing post I wrote about a real-life event. I'll quote their warning, since it is apt: "if you are triggered by rape scenarios, please do NOT read on." Or click on the following link:

A Confession -NSFW, and DO NOT READ IF TRIGGERED BY RAPE SCENARIOS

Here are the comments I left over there:

Firstly, I want to point out that your "almost raped and murdered" introduction fails to make it clear (as I did in my post) that the woman in question was never touched or harmed in any way, and indeed probably never knew and doesn't know, that she was in any danger from me. For that, let us be thankful.

Now, I would like to address a few points where I believe I may have been misunderstood:

SE’s brand of feminism is not in line with what is best for females, but always, without fail, must contain benefit for males.


This is not what I have said. It is a definition of what I call "manefism", which makes me an ally to feminism but not a feminist. I identify as a feminist because I want to see the world a better place for women. I identify as a feminist ally because I believe that the success of feminism will make the world a better place for men.

Indeed, the one of the first things apparent in The Confession above is how the whole scenario would have affected him (and his soul) forever and ever. There is nowhere any real concern, other than secondarily, of the woman’s life/feelings/family, only of his “eternal soul”."


Once again, you have misread my original post. The apparent lack of concern for others is described clearly, because that was a symptom of my depressive state. I was simply describing clearly for my reader what my mental state was at the time of the incident. It is not the way I feel about the event now (as if it was, I wouldn't see any point in sharing the experience at all). If it makes any difference, yes, I'm glad I haven't killed anyone because it means that anyone I might have killed is instead living and breathing and unharmed. Happy now?

Furthermore, his act was not a spontaneous one, it was planned and equipped for, over a period of time.

Clearly, the cathartic (therapeutic) release did NOT work at all.


This is, again, a misunderstanding. My reasoning behind claiming that having watched the death-fetish movie is as follows (incidentally, you are right to assume it was staged and not real - the website it originated on has several different videos showing the victim dying in several different ways - I think it is important to draw a distinction between "snuff", which is where the victim actually did die, and "death fetish porn" where the victim only pretends to die):

  • I had masturbated to orgasm; non-violent or non-BDSM porn would not have achieved this effect for me. (Incidentally, the claim that I would have to watch a film every hour is utterly unsupported by my statements; and this line of reasoning shows that it would be much less frequent than that, unless you think that male sexual desire and performance resets much more quickly than it ever has for me!)
  • Therefore I was exhausted sexually, and less interested at that time in sex than I would have been had my sexual energy not been released in that manner.
  • Therefore, when I had the opportunity to carry out an attack that, as you say, I had planned for over a period of time, I did not take the opportunity. I believe that I would have done so had I not had that release.
  • Therefore, a woman's life was saved by violent porn.

The "therapeutic release" argument stands as a separate issue. Since you will no doubt claim that obviously in my case it was failing over a long period of time, I will reply to that argument by pointing out that the associated guilt that modern society places on these types of release can be counter-productive. Especially when coupled with clinical depression.

From whence did these urges spring? If the pro-pornography activists argue that cathartic release is one of the main benefits of pornography, then that can only argue that urges to rape and murder are already within and need release. That really does not say a lot for the calibre of pro-pornography activist — that they are raping/murdering scum and need an outlet or else they unleash their true selves on the innocent population(!)


I explained precisely where my urge to rape came from, and I agree that, no, it does not cast me in a good light - I am a flawed human being, but I do not deny my flaws. Here is what I said: "When I feel suicidal, it takes the form of destroying the world around me rather than destroying myself... the firm belief that my depression gave me, that I could never find a willing [sexual] partner." I admit that this displays a sense of male entitlement to women's bodies, something that I have hopefully largely unlearned in recent years. I am not making a defence of myself here, I am just making my motivations clearer. To be even clearer still about what I described, I note you say, "Radical feminists (”RFs”) rarely take this view, that ‘raping/murdering scum’ need an outlet or else they turn on the innocent population. Instead they view that although there may be a tiny percentage of the population who are incapable of telling right-from-wrong..." Well, as I tried to explain in my OP, because of my depression, I was one of that tiny percentage, at the time of the incident. That is why I said in my OP that, had I described any of this to a medical practitioner, then I would have been locked up under the Mental Health Act (1984) for the protection of myself and others!

Bringing this back around to BDSM, a self-confessed practitioner of BDSM (”a Dom”) who maintains he is not his normal self (in severe depression) merely attempts to act out a further of his BDSM “play” or games. Not less, not opposite, but further along the continuum.


Now, I searched in vain for any point where I claimed that my desire to rape and murder were a "continuation" of BDSM play or "games". That is because I never said it. And I never said it, because it just isn't true. Which makes the rest of your argument somewhat of a canard. BDSM is different from rape, because BDSM is CONSENSUAL, and ENJOYED BY BOTH PARTIES. Describing it as "subjugation of another person to satisfy one’s own needs" is completely mendacious and misguided. There is no continuum between BDSM and rape or murder. There just isn't.

***

Oh yes, a couple more points:

You seem offended that I posted with the intention of helping to stop others from committing murder and rape. Apparently it slipped your attention that that meant I posted hoping to make sure that women don't get raped and murdered!

Secondly, you might want to read a follow-up post, prompted by someone who approached these issues with a lot more respect than you have.

Interview with a sadist (link NSFW)

Finally, there is zero chance that I will ever remove the post in question (What? Did you think I would act like a coward and hide from the truth, because you seek to use it to discredit me?) The post will stand because I hope and believe it can help reduce the number of rapes and murders committed by desperate and emotionally disturbed young men.

9 things wot people said:

  1. All I can think is that you must have pissed off some people who had some time on their hands!

    ReplyDelete
  2. While that post is disturbing, I never got the impression you put it up to "encourage" people to do anything other than SEEK HELP if they felt the same sort of feelings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh yeah, and I left a comment on the second post on that blog.

    I find it...interesting...that someone would anonymously created a blog solely dedicated to trashing one person. Sounds a little like teenagers on myspace to me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Ren.

    Yes, it's a disturbing post. As I said to Dana, it's supposed to be disturbing, and if you didn't find it disturbing THEN I'd start wondering if you might be a sociopath! And yes, I posted it to encourage others to seek help but also to let people know that they can choose not to act out the urges, and that the urges themselves don't make a person evil (which is what I needed to know when I was growing up with my sadistic sexuality). And the reason I want people to get help, or to know they don't have to be evil, is because that way women don't get raped and murdered!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh yeah - and it might help to record your comment somewhere else, cos it doesn't seem likely they'll actually approve it, y'know? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm the Anonymous who left a comment about why I love you as a writer on your crush page that was related to the topic of this post. But part of it got cut off there. It was supposed to read:
    I love ya for talking about thinking you were a monster because I had a nervous breakdown when I was a teenager over that issue, and I never hear anyone talk about those kind of thoughts. I wish someone had taken me aside when I was thirteen and said "Look, some people are excited by violence, it doesn't necessarily mean that you will be an evil man if you don't want to be. If you keep it clear in your mind that you don't want to be a killer or a rapist then you won't be. You can't accidentally kill or rape someone against your will. Whatever ghoulish thoughts you like, remember who you are and who you are not." I think if there was ever a time when I was in danger of becoming a psychopath it was when I was desperately trying not to think about those thoughts and trying to pretend they didn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah, but did the radfems accuse you of BRINGING DOWN HEART'S BLOG? Excuse me, dude, but I am STILL the most important blogger around here, okay?

    This is the risk people like you and Ren and others have taken in writing in-depth and fearlessly about sex, sexuality-in-general and sexual fantasies in particular. This is why I won't do it on my blog.

    I HAVE written some things in a few places, and I am sure one of these days I'll be outed as a fellow-traveler-perv also. I'm ready for that, but I won't give them their cue--they'll need to start their witch hunt on their own.

    If you'd written some mealy-mouthed bullshit about how much you loooooove da wimminz and how we hold up half the sky (intentional dig at John Lennon, who enjoyed his occasional sex tourism) and all that sentimental claptrap, well, they'd be linking you and fawning all over you. In fact, they will link a guy like that (ain't naming any names!), before they will link ME, a second-waver.

    I've had posts at Feminist Critics named after me, but I admit, impressed you get your own website! :P

    ReplyDelete
  8. Excuse me, dude, but I am STILL the most important blogger around here, okay?

    Oh, I wouldn't dream of challenging that!

    This is the risk people like you and Ren and others have taken in writing in-depth and fearlessly about sex, sexuality-in-general and sexual fantasies in particular.

    I went into writing what I do on my blogs, with eyes wide open - I knew some people would despise me for it, even blame or target me for it. But for me, I think it is important that I do write it openly, because (as discussed above) I think writing about these things helps other people to cope with their sexuality and that helps people make healthy decisions about their bodies and how they relate to other people.

    I gave up a long time ago on trying to get people to like me. If people like me of their own accord, that's great - but if not, I am not going to pretend to be something I'm not, when doing so probably won't make a difference anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ahh, how ironic I would meander back here now. What is wrong with these people??

    Much of my problem with the world is the people who rape out of lack of willingness to face and acknowledge that they want to or it's something wrong... or out of pack mentality... and the people who stand and watch out of fear.

    The fact that rape is evil but nothing ever counts as rape is what keeps that particular ball rolling!

    Anyway, as totally thrown as I was by your post, I never thought you were a bad person. It's just such a ridiculous dichotomy in my brain.

    Interestingly, I now work with a woman with a rape fetish. Frankly, if she had been born male she probably would have been a rapist. Her partner was a victim of serious childhood abuse and it took meeting her online for her to be able to get out of her internal cycle of justifications.

    Bullshit like that post are what solidified her desire to be a rapist. The only thing that made her feel good was violent fantasies, and being told she was basically fucked as a human being meant "well I'm a piece of shit anyway, why not?"

    Can't they put their energy into HELPING people rather than HATING people??

    ReplyDelete

Comments Moderation Policy

This blog is intended to be a place where I can develop my thoughts freely and get free and honest responses. Essentially, it is my safe space, and for that reason I have elected to maintain this blog as a moderated space. However, I am opposed in general to censorship and believe that usually the best way to kill a bad idea is with a better one, so very few comments will be rejected. Comments designed to cause offence for the sake of it (e.g. abusive or inflammatory remarks with no other content), or else those that I feel cross a boundary of human decency, are most likely to be rejected.